Sunday, November 11, 2007
Kentucky Senate Vote Count
From The Courier-Journal:
Fifteen senators said they likely would vote yes or are leaning in that direction. Thirteen said they would vote no or would probably do so.
With the legislative session less than two months away, Beshear needs to get eight more votes from among 10 remaining senators -- eight of whom remain undecided or won't divulge their opinion.
Beshear
supports a constitutional amendment that would legalize casino
gambling at Kentucky tracks and a few other locations.
Beshear
estimates that casinos would generate as much as $500 million in
annual revenue for the state. Specific details such as what type of
gambling (table games, slots only) and how revenue will be divided
(race purses, education, etc.) are currently unknown and will be
worked out as various bills are introduced and debated in the months
to come.
As I pointed out on Wednesday, the issue must begin in the House
and get must gain a 3/5 majority in each body (60 votes in the
House, 23 in the Senate) before it goes to Kentucky voters in
November of 2008. With the issue generally being split along party
lines with Democrats in support and Republican against, getting the
votes needed in the Democrat-controlled House is seen as likely
since the party has a 63 member majority. However, with 21
Republicans in the 38 member Senate, this issue will clearly face
more of an uphill battle in that upper body of the legislature.
There are currently several riverboat based casinos with full table
games along the Kentucky border with Caesar's outside of Louisville,
Belterra
outside of Cincinnati, and
Aztar
outside of Evansville. However, there are few gambling options for
individuals along the Kentucky-Tennessee boarder with areas like
Kentucky Downs -- less than half an hour from the Nashville suburbs
-- becoming a major beneficiary should casino gaming be approved.
By
looking at the map of county-by-county voting in the
Governor's race, we should get some indication of where voters may
support expanded gambling. However, while I fully expect that the
deep red sections of the south central counties to be a hard sell (I
grew up in one of those counties) -- don't let the clear
Beshear
majority in the far east and west portions of the commonwealth fool
you. Those very religious voters are going to be anything
but a lock for a pro-gambling measure -- especially in a
Presidential election year. The wedge issue that drove voters to the
polls in 2004 was a gay marriage amendment, in 2008 you can fully
expect that wedge issue to be expanded gaming.